Who qualifies to file a YouTube Eating Disorders claim?

Generally, minors (or their parents/guardians) who used YouTube and later experienced Eating Disorders that required medical, psychiatric, or other professional care. Eligibility depends on your state's filing deadline and the specifics of your case. There is no public claim form or automatic payment — an individual family must file a complaint through a law firm to participate.

What signs are associated with Eating Disorders tied to YouTube use?

Reported signs include: Rapid weight loss or repeated weight fluctuations, Skipping meals, secretive eating, or ritualized eating behaviors, Preoccupation with calories, food rules, or body weight. These are not a diagnosis — a qualified professional should evaluate any concerns.

Does it cost anything to see if I have a case?

No. Case reviews are free and handled on a contingency basis — you pay nothing unless there is a recovery for your family. There is currently no MDL-wide settlement or established per-person payout; any recovery would depend on future developments in the litigation.

YouTube

Eating Disorders

YouTube Eating Disorders Lawsuit — Legal Help for Affected Families

Q: Is there a lawsuit against YouTube for Eating Disorders?

Yes. YouTube is a defendant in the federal social media MDL (MDL 3047) and coordinated state proceedings, which include claims that its product design contributed to Eating Disorders in minor users. Plaintiffs in MDL 3047 allege YouTube negligently designed features that predictably funneled minors toward pro-eating-disorder content and that the company had internal evidence of eating-disorder harms yet failed to redesign the product.

The recommendation system is alleged to surface pro-anorexia, extreme-fasting, and body-check content to teens, and to intensify exposure through Up Next and Shorts.

Signs to Watch For

These are signs that may warrant a medical or mental-health evaluation — not a diagnosis. If you're concerned about your child, speak with a qualified professional.

Rapid weight loss or repeated weight fluctuations
Skipping meals, secretive eating, or ritualized eating behaviors
Preoccupation with calories, food rules, or body weight
Excessive exercise, especially after eating
Frequent trips to the bathroom immediately after meals
Wearing baggy clothes to conceal the body
Fainting, dizziness, or hair loss

What the Litigation Alleges

Plaintiffs in MDL 3047 allege YouTube negligently designed features that predictably funneled minors toward pro-eating-disorder content and that the company had internal evidence of eating-disorder harms yet failed to redesign the product.

Developing litigation · August 26, 2026

Current developments

Meta settled the states' case for up to $16.68 billion. On August 26, 2026, mid-trial in Oakland, Meta agreed to pay a maximum of $16.68 billion to resolve claims by states that it designed Facebook and Instagram to addict children, misled consumers about safety, and improperly collected children's data. Meta also agreed to nationwide teen safeguards, including daily usage limits and nighttime blocks, and denied wrongdoing. This settlement resolves the states' enforcement claims — it does not pay individual families and does not create a claim form. Individual injury claims in MDL 3047 and in state courts are not resolved by it, and Snap, TikTok, and YouTube are not parties to it.
Source: Reuters
The addiction lawsuits are moving forward. The Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals rejected Meta, Google, TikTok, and Snapchat's bid to halt more than 3,000 social media addiction lawsuits before trial. The companies argued Section 230 shielded them from failure-to-warn claims about addictive design; the court held that Section 230 is a defense to liability rather than blanket immunity, so the appeal was premature. The underlying federal cases, including MDL 3047, remain centralized before Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers in Oakland, California.
Early verdicts and penalties have gone against the platforms. A Los Angeles jury found Meta and Google negligent in the first bellwether trial, awarding $6 million to a plaintiff who said she became addicted to Instagram and YouTube as a child. Meta separately lost both phases of a New Mexico case — $375 million in damages for misleading safety claims, plus a $567 million public-nuisance penalty.
A Meta whistleblower testified that Zuckerberg ignored child-safety calls. Arturo Béjar, a former Meta safety engineer and Instagram consultant, told jurors in the 29-state attorney general trial that CEO Mark Zuckerberg received internal requests to prioritize child safety and publicly touted safety practices while the company operated with a "don't ask, don't tell" approach to users under 13. Béjar said, "I feel that you just cannot trust Mark Zuckerberg with kids." The testimony came in the states' trial, which settled on August 26, 2026, and not in the federal MDL 3047 personal-injury docket.
Source: AP News

This is a developing litigation update, not a settlement announcement. These rulings involve other parties and other facts; they do not establish that any new claimant will recover anything. There is no guaranteed recovery in any individual case. Read the full litigation status · See all dated case updates.

Start your free case review

Frequently Asked Questions

Free case review — YouTube Eating Disorders

Confidential. Reviewed by our intake team, usually within one business day. Submitting this form does not create an attorney-client relationship and does not guarantee any recovery.

Free, confidential case review

Speak with our legal team about whether your family may have a claim in the ongoing social media harm litigation (MDL 3047). Filing preserves your place and protects deadlines as the case develops; there is no public claim form and no automatic payment.

100% confidential
Same-day callback

Start intake form Do I qualify?

Other harms alleged against YouTube

YouTube & Body Dysmorphia →YouTube & Depression & Anxiety →YouTube & Self-Harm & Suicidal Ideation →YouTube & Sleep Disruption & Compulsive Use →

Eating Disorders claims on other platforms

Facebook & Eating Disorders →Instagram & Eating Disorders →Snapchat & Eating Disorders →TikTok & Eating Disorders →

From the blog

Recent coverage relevant to YouTube and eating disorders claims.

Meta Settles States' Social Media Harm Claims for Up to $16.68 Billion
Meta agreed to pay up to $16.68 billion to resolve claims brought by states over child safety, addictive design, and children's data. It resolves the states' enforcement claims — not individual family claims, and not MDL 3047.
6 min read
Meta Whistleblower Arturo Béjar: 'You Cannot Trust Mark Zuckerberg with Kids'
Arturo Béjar told jurors in the 29-state trial against Meta that CEO Mark Zuckerberg ignored internal child-safety calls and that the company operated a "don't ask, don't tell" policy on under-13 users.
4 min read
Jury Selection Begins in Meta Youth Harms Trial in Oakland Federal Court
Jury selection began Wednesday in the federal trial over claims that Meta's platforms harmed youth mental health and tracked children under 13 without parental consent. California, Colorado, Kentucky and New Jersey go first.
5 min read

All articles Case updates changelog

Do you qualify?About the litigation Filing deadlines by state