Jury Selection Begins in Meta Youth Harms Trial in Oakland Federal Court

August 12, 2026 · 5 min read

Jury selection began Wednesday, August 12, 2026, in Oakland, California, in the federal trial over claims that Meta's platforms harmed youth mental health and tracked children under 13 in violation of federal law, the Associated Press reported.

What is on trial in Oakland

Opening arguments are scheduled for next week, and the trial is expected to run six to eight weeks. Meta faces 29 states in the federal multidistrict lawsuit filed in 2023, but this first trial includes only four of them — California, Colorado, Kentucky and New Jersey. Eight other states filed in their own state courts, including Tennessee, where a trial is already ongoing.

The 2023 complaint alleges that Meta routinely collected data on children under 13 without parental consent, in violation of federal law, and that the company “repeatedly misled the public about the substantial dangers of its social media platforms.” The states are seeking penalties and structural changes to how the platforms are designed for young users.

U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers — the judge overseeing the federal social media litigation in the Northern District of California — asked prospective jurors about their own social media activity, what they had heard about other Meta lawsuits, and whether they held strong views about social media companies.

How this differs from the individual family cases

This is a government enforcement trial. The state attorneys general are suing on behalf of the public, and any penalties or injunctive relief go toward punishing the company and changing platform design — not to individual families.

Separately, thousands of personal injury claims brought by families are consolidated before the same court as MDL No. 3047 (N.D. Cal.). A parent whose child was harmed receives nothing from the state trial. To preserve an individual claim, a family has to retain counsel and file its own complaint, and the deadline depends on the statute of limitations in their state.

There is no MDL-wide settlement, no public claim form, and no guaranteed recovery in any case.

The wider picture heading into trial

The Oakland trial follows a run of adverse developments for Meta. Last week a New Mexico court ordered the company to pay $567 million to address harms to young people, in the second phase of that state's landmark trial. That came on top of the $375 million in civil penalties jurors imposed in March after finding Meta knowingly harmed children's mental health and concealed what it knew about child sexual exploitation on its platforms. Meta is appealing the New Mexico decision.

Meta disputes the states' claims. “We strongly disagree with these allegations and are confident the evidence will show our longstanding commitment to supporting young people,” the company said in a statement, pointing to teen-safety features it has introduced.

The case is part of a broader wave of litigation against Meta, TikTok, Snap and Google's YouTube over addictive design, data collection from minors, and youth mental health. A dated log of these developments is kept on the case updates page.

Read more on the specific harms

If you are trying to understand how these claims map to a particular platform and a particular injury, these pages break it down:

If your family was affected

A free case review looks at which platforms were involved, your child's age at the time, what harm occurred, and what filing deadline applies where you live. There is no cost and no obligation, and no outcome is promised.

If you or your child is in crisis, call or text 988 for the Suicide & Crisis Lifeline, text HOME to 741741 for the Crisis Text Line, or call 911 in an emergency.


Attorney advertising. Responsible attorney: Sean Patrick Quinlan, Esq., Quinlan Law Group, PA Supreme Court ID 86858. This article is general information, not legal advice, and does not create an attorney-client relationship.

meta
instagram
facebook
mdl-3047
state-attorney-general
trial
child-safety

Related articles

Pennsylvania has joined the states taking TikTok to court over what children see and how long the app keeps them scrolling — and the allegations echo the claims already at the center of the federal social media litigation.

5 min read

A federal appeals court refused to stop more than 3,000 social media addiction lawsuits before trial, holding that Section 230 is a defense to liability — not blanket immunity. Here is what that means for families weighing whether to file.

6 min read

Join the update list

Add your email to our list for periodic updates on platform deep-dives, warning signs, filing deadlines, and MDL 3047 news. Updates are sent manually, not on a fixed schedule. For instant notifications of every new article, subscribe to our RSS feed. No spam — unsubscribe any time.

Informational updates only — not legal advice, and no attorney-client relationship is created.

Free, confidential case review

Speak with our legal team about whether your family may have a claim in the ongoing social media harm litigation (MDL 3047). Filing preserves your place and protects deadlines as the case develops; there is no public claim form and no automatic payment.

  • 100% confidential
  • Same-day callback